![]() We’re limiting this list just to films that have been released since 1972 - which, not coincidentally, happens to be the year that a certain movie about an American family with a penchant for making offers we couldn’t refuse first hit theaters. So, in the spirit of celebrating our annual Independence Day, we’re picking what we believe to be the 50 best movies over the past 50 years that look at America, directly or otherwise, and show us something about ourselves. They have also shed light on what’s woefully in need of improvement, questioned the foundational imperfections that sometimes threaten to become chasms, and cast some cold, hard glances at nearly 250 years of American living. The movies have reminded us what’s so wonderful about this ongoing experiment taking place from sea to shining sea. These united states have been the subject of those flickering pictures on a screen almost since the birth of the medium, though the past half-century in particular has seen a lot of diverse, singular and often complicated movies taking on the checkered past and occasionally rocky present of our nation. William's backstory is also given a rejig, something that one critic disapproved of, saying: "Any hint of his descent from the lowland gentry (i.e., the lesser nobility) is erased, and he is presented as an economically and politically marginalised Highlander and 'a farmer'."įurther inaccuracies include William's relationship with Isabella of France, something that was actually fabricated, and also the infamous warpaint seen on Mel Gibson's face, which was apparently not used at that time.Welcome to America, according to the movies - a melting-pot mix of triumph and tragedy, endless opportunities and bone-deep prejudices, age-old traditions and amber waves of grain and all the things that money can or can’t buy. Also, The iconic Battle of Stirling Bridge scene is also missing two key elements – the rebellion leader Andrew de Moray and, of course, the actual bridge. In fact, author John O’Farrell once wrote: "It couldn’t have been more off the mark if a plasticine dog was added to the cast and it was retitled William Wallace and Gromit."Įven the title itself is misleading because if anyone was called "Brave Heart" during this time it was Robert the Bruce, not William Wallace. Mel Gibson's film about William Wallace and Scotland's first war for independence has become well known for its inaccuracies. "Creative licence is one thing, but slandering a great man’s reputation – while buying into the nasty 1950s prejudice that gay men automatically constituted a security risk – is quite another." One damning review of this inclusion had this to say: This has been described as "offensive" to Alan – as it suggests that he would commit the treasonous crime of concealing a spy inside Bletchley Park. The film also shows John blackmailing Alan, who is forced to conceal John's espionage upon finding out he is a spy. Yes, John was at Bletchley Park, but not as part of Alan's team, and it would have been incredibly unlikely that they ever met. One important inaccuracy is the storyline with the Soviet spy, John Cairncross, who we see in Alan's team. While this did indeed happen, Alan was actually forewarned about his best friend's condition. Early dramatisations include Alan learning that his best friend had died out of the blue. Throughout this movie about cracking the enigma machine, we see three parts of Alan Turing's life, and in all three there are a number of inaccuracies, particularly about Turing himself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |